Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek V3

Sonnet still wins on deep refactors and code that needs taste. DeepSeek wins on raw quality-per-dollar — it's often 20-30× cheaper for comparable output.

Try Claude 3.5 Sonnet Try DeepSeek V3

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic's best balance of quality and cost — a coder favourite.

State-of-the-art code generation — especially refactoring
200k context (largest of the frontier models)
Careful, calibrated tone — less over-confident than GPT-4o
Excellent at following detailed system prompts

Cost: Around 3,750–7,500 tokens per typical message. 15M Pro tokens buy ~2,000–4,000 Sonnet messages.

Full page →

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

The open-weight model punching way above its price tag.

Frontier-quality reasoning at budget prices
Excellent at code — benchmarks near Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Open weights (self-host if you want)
64k context

Cost: Often under 1,000 tokens per message. Some of the best quality-per-credit on the platform.

Full page →

Don't pick — use both.

On Faceb.ai, one $14.99/month plan gives you every frontier model. Switch per message. No extra subscriptions.

Go Pro Try free